By Craig Smith
If you’ve looked back through some of our recent posts, you might think that all we do is bang on about is deposits, deposits and deposits. Well, maybe not but here’s some more important information that you might find useful.
A recent court ruling has changed the way in which information should be provided to tenants paying a deposit that would be protected under the Housing Act 2004. Since 6th April 2007 any deposit taken for an Assured Shorthold Tenancy must be protected by one of the 3 deposit schemes (see my earlier post on deposit protection) but now additional information needs to be provided to tenants.
Prescribed Information
It is already stated in the legislation that tenants must be provided with certain Prescribed Information for the deposit. This information includes where the deposit will be held and the Landlords & Tenants rights to the deposit at the end of the tenancy. If this information has not been given correctly, or not provided at all, Landlords could be forced to pay 3x the deposit amount, plus the deposit back to the tenants.
This is the same for deposits that have not been registered in the timeline set out by the scheme rules, currently 14 days. Landlords cannot ‘get around’ the legislation by suddenly registering a deposit later in the tenancy if the tenancy turns sour. However, new rules are looking set to be published some time in 2012 which will extend the time to register a deposit to 30 days but we’ll wait and see when this happens!
Recent Court Case
The recent case which looks set to have changed the way in which information is given to tenants is the case of Suurpere V Nice. The full details of the case can be found using that link but the very basics of the case are: a deposit that was taken in January 2009 was not registered until July 2009. So, quite clearly not within the 14 day rule! Despite the fact that the tenant had left the property in rent arrears and goods still at the property that would need to be removed at the Landlrod expense, the Landlord was ordered to pay the deposit back to the tenant in full plus 3x the deposit amount.
Now reading this right now, this might seem unfair on the Landlord and to a certain point, I have to agree. But, the rules of deposit protection are very clear and Landlords cannot use the excuse of having a bad tenant to get out of any fines imposed by a court.
Rogue Landlords
A little bit of advice now to tenants. When you are looking to rent a property how much attention do you pay to the Landlord or Agent? Sometimes stickers on an office window might just get in the way of the property your trying to look at through the glass but do you know what they mean? It’s a tough world out there at the moment so make sure that the deposit you have paid is looked after!
Recent Comments