{"id":191,"date":"2012-03-15T15:53:32","date_gmt":"2012-03-15T15:53:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.staffordshire.castle-estates.co.uk\/lettings-blog\/?p=191"},"modified":"2012-03-15T15:53:32","modified_gmt":"2012-03-15T15:53:32","slug":"the-localism-act-changes-on-the-horizon-for-assured-shorthold-tenancies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/2012\/03\/15\/the-localism-act-changes-on-the-horizon-for-assured-shorthold-tenancies\/","title":{"rendered":"The Localism Act: Changes on the Horizon for Assured Shorthold Tenancies"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Craig Smith<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Oh no! Not another post about deposits! Around 12 months ago we posted<\/a> the importance of dealing with deposits correctly. In December of last year we wrote about a court ruling regarding a deposit for an Assured Shorthold Tenancy that had not been protected by the Landlord. Since then a number of changes have been announced that change the way in which deposits should be dealt with and these changes come in to force on 6th<\/sup> April 2012.<\/p>\n

Prescribed Information for AST\u2019s<\/strong><\/p>\n

Under the \u2018old rules\u2019, Landlords would have 14 days in which to serve the Prescribed Information<\/a> to the tenant. This is the document that gives the tenant certain information about where the deposit is held and what happens to it. With the changes that are due to come in to force in April, Landlords will now have 30 days to protect the deposit and issue the Prescribed Information.<\/p>\n

But this doesn\u2019t mean relaxed rules for Landlords as if the deposit has not been protected within those 30 days, the tenant can take the Landlord to court to claim this back. Neither can the Landlord wriggle out of any penalties by protecting the deposit at that time as this will now not be accepted as sufficient protection for the deposit. The fines for non protection of the deposit used to be a mandatory 3x the amount of the deposit, plus the original deposit to be paid back to the tenant. Now it can be any amount between that of the original deposit and a maximum of 3x the deposit amount.<\/p>\n

Existing Tenancies to be Protected<\/strong><\/p>\n

The new rules also require deposits for any existing AST\u2019s to be registered within 30 days from 6th<\/sup> April 2012. This is regardless of whether the tenancy began before or after the date that Tenancy Deposit Protection came into force (6th<\/sup> April 2007) but of course any AST\u2019s that started, or renewed, from that date should already be registered!<\/p>\n

The reason for this is that the new legislation states that any new tenancy should be registered and the wording in the Housing Act 1988 means that any tenancy that goes to a periodic status is classed as a new tenancy.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Tenancies Not Under the Housing Act 1988<\/strong><\/p>\n

The legislation is still yet to reach other types of tenancy agreement, such as Company Let or Assured Tenancies. Of course, this may change in the future but we\u2019ll cross that bridge if we come to it! Non-AST tenancy deposits may still be registered if all parties are in agreement but it is always best to check before registering.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Craig Smith Oh no! Not another post about deposits! Around 12 months ago we posted the importance of dealing with deposits correctly. In December of last year we wrote about a court ruling regarding a deposit for an Assured Shorthold Tenancy that had not been protected by the Landlord. Since then a number of …<\/span> Read More →<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2],"tags":[11,12,13,29],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.castle-estates.co.uk\/staffordshire\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}