Tag Archives: Buying Property

21Feb 2012

Property Landlord advice: Standards and Legislation still not getting through.

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

As a Letting Agent I looked at three houses yesterday, all at the invite of the Landlord and all for evaluation. Three Landlords who were all asking for my opinion on the readiness and valuation of their property in the current market place, and all three were due differing responses for varying reasons but the issue that stood out was that the message about legislation and property readiness is still not getting out there and we still need to preach to either the unconverted or the unknowing.

House of Mulitple Occupation.

The first was a terraced property which had been lovingly restored by the owners. The Gentleman had made a really good job of renovating the property and had managed to change a property so much that it no longer felt like a traditional terraced house, even though it was. The issue for this Landlord was whether the property would take three or four Tenants as a room let. What came as a surprise to him were the requirements for a House of Multiple Occupation that he had to adhere to, because even though he had been carrying out the work for several years, he was not aware of what was needed. He will now speak to the Council, because even though the property did not need a License, the regulations surrounding safety, once more than two family groups occupy the home, remain the same. He will then be able to decide between renting per room, or renting to a Family.

Property in fit condition.

The second was a house that had been purchased cheaply and the new owner, having started some work, was looking for advice as to a valuation. Unfortunately, I had to confirm that in my opinion it needed far more money spending on it before it was even fit for purpose. This concerned a new RCD fuse board, new carpets, all of which were badly fitted, new decoration, all of which was multi prime colours, repair and make good to several areas such as stair rails, chipped tiling, poor flooring and a general electric check because of the obvious additional wiring installation that had been added to the original for what looked like several years. Not forgetting what looked like unvented wall mounted gas heaters and we had a property which was far from fit for purpose.

Unwanted information?

 I certainly felt that the Landlord did not feel the property was far from ready once he had completed the new bathroom, and my sincere hope is that some other agency does not take the property on without the work being carried out, but such calls do become one of the hardest things we have to do as Agents.  Hopefully my message set around my central point that with such choice of quality housing about, why should a property in this condition be rented out in competition with the rest of the market was understood. The worry is why both of the properties above should get to the stage of what we saw yesterday without knowing what was needed before this stage?

Good advice.

Perhaps it is that people do not really want to hear? But this is not the case with the first Landlord, because we have already looked after two of their houses and they are good Landlords, so it is a fact that the legislation message has not got through, which is doubly compounded, when we heard of just how much time the Landlord had spent negotiating with the local council over matters surrounding access to the property over the last three years? There is a lesson to be learnt here, even for us as Agents, for whilst we knew the Landlord owned the property and was carrying out renovation, we were not aware of its intended use until yesterday and I definitely feel we should have had a conversation prior to the properties completion. As Tenant Find Landlords, we have assumed they knew and the lesson is clear for us to see, enquire ask and speak at every opportunity and what came as a surprise could have been avoided.

Third time lucky.

The third visit came as an absolute pleasure, here was a Landlord who had moved back in too his home, between Tenants whilst he bought a new house for himself having sold his last house before buying again. In the meantime, he had taken the opportunity to refurbish the house again, fitting new carpets, re-decorating and fitting a new Bathroom. Every task he got spot on, using clean fresh schemes with neutral colours, taking the opportunity to tidy up the garden, laying slate along the edges of paths to reduce the burden of weeding for the next Tenant and improving the appearance. Seven years ago, when the house first came to the market, it looked just as it does now and all the time we have been asked for comment and opinion as to what was being done. And therein lies the answer, no matter if we feel we are interfering, to do our job correctly, we must speak and spread the word to Landlords as much as possible.

Lesson learnt.

Of course we cannot speak if we do not get the chance to speak as with the second Landlord, before we are invited to the property, so to put that right, apart from just offering it to the people we do speak with, we are going to physically advertise free advice to Landlords for the next three months. That way, we might just save a Landlord on another day, being so surprised about what was needed from him in presenting his property to the market in a fit and proper state in the first place! 

27Jan 2012

Current Property News: Conflicting reports on housing market, but confidence starting to appear.

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

It would seem that nobody can agree on how the property market is going to perform this year, with the same news being reported at both ends of the scale in news that has been released today. It just makes decisions so much harder for the ‘man in the street’ who  appears once again to have started to look with interest at property as a favourable route for investment.

The only way is up!

It was said on a BBC news report recently (sorry I forget the context) that the property market should be interesting for potential investors, as the only way was up! But it seems that different parties are still prepared to place the slant that is more relevant to them when market information is released, with the Mortgage Provider giving a positive slant to the news and  a community site taking the same information and presenting it in a negative light!

Professional view.

But what we are noticing is confirmation that people are reviewing property and making that decision about investing through ‘Buy to Let’ once again. Only today I have been to value two brand new properties that are nearing completion and the builder has decided that it is in his best interest to retain and rent the properties rather than sell them now, because of the perceived growth over the next few years. This was not a decision I had to encourage, it was a decision that had already been made before I even met the Landlord. What it does prove, is that professionals feel that the market has probably bottomed out or is very close to doing so.

Individual investment.

The same then happened when I returned to the office to find a couple that had dropped in for advise (I am very pleased to say because of recommendation!) who again, had already decided to ‘Buy to Let’ and were looking for information about where to buy as well as what type of house. It was good to see such confidence from both parties, who represented both the general public and the housing industry, both in just one day.

Differing responses.

Now I know as well as anybody, that one swallow does not make an English summer! But it would be good to see figures such as those reported today given in just the plain context of what they say, rather than opinion of what they represent when translation of information can mean different things to different bodies, but it does seem that gone are the days when news was reported and we were all allowed to come to our own conclusion about what that news meant to ourselves!

10Jan 2012

Property Landlord advice: Utility Warehouse still getting it wrong.

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

Last year I had cause to write a Blog about the manner in which Utility Warehouse try to invoice Landlords when they have closed their account and the Tenant has not sorted the new supply out to their satisfaction. Not because they had not been contacted, not even because they had no contact details for the Tenant, no, purely because they were not satisfied with the manner in which the new account had been opened.

12 Months on?

No change, even though at the time, I had several long involved conversations with them about the letters I was receiving, even though the Tenant was doing everything possible to pay for their own account, Utility Warehouse continued to write to me as if the outstanding invoice was my responsibility. I can assure you the resulting phone calls were many and heated, but it took something like six weeks to straightened matters out and confirm the new Tenant was in deed, responsible for their own costs!

Time for another letter.

It was not that they had written again or even the consequences of the content of the letter that has dismayed me this time, but the fact that they had failed to close my account, even though their operatives tried to tell me they had (strange because the letter had my name and the same old account number on it!) Well, I say my name; they had managed to change the spelling and actually written to my next door neighbour therefore having the wrong address.

Unbelievable arrogance.

The letter was a request to set up a Direct Debit because mine had just been closed and whilst I have to admit that when I first called, my temper was not at its best, I did not take kindly to the UW representative trying to tell me they must be correct and that I was wrong in my assumptions, even when I asked what dates they had on the account and she confirmed it had closed in August 2010, the penny did not drop. I left her to work out that if the account had been closed in 2010 there was no longer any need for a DD to be set up!

Human error or system.

I called again! The excuse for the error, for error it obviously was, was what really gets to me about such organisations, because they tried to tell me that the letter with the old account number on it, with the change of spelling of my name and my next door neighbours address, must have been a technical error. Now is it me? Or is it blindingly difficult for a computer to randomly contact me a year after our last contact, with the name spelt wrong and at the wrong address? No, to me this must be human error and it just raises huge questions about the manner in which they operate.

Do they care?

The reaction that you receive from UW confirms without doubt that the answer is no, they really don’t, I laughed sarcastically at their representative when he said it was computer error and he indignantly asked me why I was laughing. Well the actual answer is the frustration of dealing with them, what he got was me asking if he wanted to know the full story of my dealings with them because then he might just understand! No they do not care and I would love somebody to convince me differently, because as all Letting Agents are aware, the most difficult and unorganised companies we have to deal within our day to day dealings would be confirmed by everybody as Utility Companies!!

 

22Dec 2011

Current Property News: Housing stock stuck in the mud?

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Mike Edwards

Mortgages could become harder to get, with one in ten borrowers currently eligible for a mortgage being turned down in future. The Financial Services Authority has now published its long-awaited Mortgage Market Review. Its own impact assessment says that the proposed reforms could strip £2.9bn out of the economy because it would mean fewer people buying and selling homes, and lead to a dramatic drop in mortgage lending, affecting one million borrowers. The FSA’s final consultation paper is designed to put a permanent end to the lending excesses that were prevalent pre-credit crunch. But the crackdown could have a severe impact on the already ailing housing market. Among its many recommendations is a new ‘affordability’ regime, which will include looking at a borrower’s household spending plus a ‘stress test’ for how a borrower would cope if interest rates went up.

The incomes of older people, those aged 50-plus and coming up for retirement, would be particularly put under the spotlight. In effect the responsibility for checking affordability passes from mortgage adviser to lender, and most mortgage sales will have to be advised rather than simply executed.
The FSA’s proposals also stipulate that borrowers will not be able to factor in the possibility of future house price rises, but must be able to show other, more robust ways of being able to pay back their mortgage. In an environment where lenders are already being extremely cautious with their lending criteria and indeed cherry picking there is a danger that by placing all affordability assessments at the doors of lenders’ risk teams, this could create an even stricter lending environment.
For mortgage prisoners in negative equity, there is a ray of hope in the proposals, which suggest that the usual affordability tests are waived for such home-movers provided they have a solid track record of repayments.

However it is not just first time buyers who are suffering, next-time buyers are having it even tougher than first-time buyers, says a startling new report from Lloyds TSB.  It says that the housing market has become the most unaffordable for ‘second-steppers’ in 24 years. Many bought at the peak of the housing market in 2007 but are now unable to move on, having seen the value of their home fall by an average of 23%, leaving them £10,000 in negative equity. The second-steppers, typically aged between 25 and 34, also need to earn more than first-time buyers in order to make their move – and persuade someone to give them a mortgage. In the South-East, the average price of a second-time home means  a second-stepper would have to borrow nearly seven times average earnings – which of course the SA proposals above would not allow even if a lender was foolish enough to offer such a loan..   

Even in the Midlands – the most affordable region for second-time homes – someone trying to move up the property ladder would have to borrow four times their average salary. The home affordability ratio has risen to 5:2 for second-time buyers – the highest level since records began in 1987. The ratio for first-time buyers is 4:1. In 2007, the reverse was the case. The issue of second-stepper affordability is a key one in trying to get the housing market moving again, with the current difficulties in this segment of the market restricting the supply of starter properties for first-time buyers as well as preventing many of those who need to move from doing so.

10Nov 2011

Current Property News: Buyers feeling the freeze!

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Mike Edwards

Banks approved 6% fewer house purchase mortgages in September than in August, with 17,000 would-be first-time buyers left out in the cold.          The figure of 33,130 house purchase approvals was, however, 8% higher than in September last year though the comparison is with a very flat month from 2010. To compound this figures from the British Bankers Association show the number of remortgage approvals in September was also down on the August figure, by 8%, although about the same as in September 2010. There are some commentators who may suggest this lessening of remortgage money is not such a bad thing in terms of how over borrowed the country and individuals are.       

The BBA reports that growth in gross mortgage activity is being driven by the buy-to-let market and it is clear that a modest stimulus to gross mortgage lending is coming from the buy-to-let sector as rental yields continue to improve as we commented on recently. Indeed any recent improvement in gross lending can almost certainly be put down entirely to buy-to-let landlords taking advantage of the current rental market than a much-needed surge in lending to first-time buyers. Strict lending criteria and absurdly high deposit requirements are continuing to keep mortgage finance out of the hands of the average first-timer, and this is flooding the private rented sector with demand.    

The only problem on the horizon though for Landlords is given the additional supply and even allowing for increased rental demand, the likely sluggish future growth in the capital value of their properties may continue for some time. And if they decide to sell their portfolio what sort of market may they be selling into? Latest calculations indicate that each month there are 17,000 more frustrated buyers than before the downturn having to rely on rental accommodation because they are unable to buy. This is driving up competition for accommodation in both the flatshare sector and the wider rental market. For many investors, these conditions are too attractive to ignore, hence the growing investment in buy-to-let.         

While this continued buy-to-let interest may well alleviate some of the pressure on the current stock of rental homes, the supply will have to increase at a much faster rate to match growing demand and limit further rent rises. The CML says that in the 12 months to August an average of 15,800 first-time buyers a month secured mortgages, compared to an average of 33,100 a year between 2002 and 2007. These are staggering figures and do not bode well for the future of the housing market for several years to come. Without first time buyers the market is eventually bound to seize up – or see spectacular price falls. 

Whilst the mortgage market is doing its best to stagger on the ailing economy is entering a state of rigor mortis, and the crisis afflicting Europe makes any resurrection of growth look unlikely.   The temptation for lenders to pull further back from an unsure market and recoup equity over the winter is becoming overwhelming. Supply of credit remains painfully restricted, meaning there is almost no margin for lenders to grow their loan books, so they are being understandably cautious and focusing on targeting borrowers with big deposits.

09Sep 2011

Current Property News: Good news bad news day for renting. Not forgetting the legal issues.

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

I recently commented on how the BBC in a recent report, jumped to conclusions without researching the market to back up the assumptions that they confirmed on air. Namely, that not buying your own house was bad for individuals and supposedly the Country as a whole. There is no great surprise here because the BBC loves to report on the property market in a negative manner, I wish I knew why, but can only surmise as to the reason!

Endesleigh understand!

So it was with great pleasure that I found an article pointing out that by way of a survey that had been carried out, my own findings, from dealing with Tenants on a daily basis, were correct. One of the main reasons people are renting is because it suits their lifestyle. The ability to move on quickly, sample differing locations, City or Country, differing types of property, Flats or Houses all add to the trend for renting to become more popular up and down the UK.  I do not quite understand the reference to colours contained in the article, but will comment further on the point about price, because another article, released on the same week, completely disagrees.

The Telegraph does not!

So imagine my surprise, within five minutes finding an article that completely sees the current market in the opposite way in relation to the cost of Renting against the cost of Buying? I accept that the report does refer to first time buyers and specific advantages available to them in the housing market, but I think we have to look at where the information comes from in this case. Unfortunately, we are not given that much detail, but what I can state, is that the average rent of £677 for a two bed flat, is heavily influenced by London rates and is therefore unrepresentative of the rest of the Country. More detail would be useful.

Complicated process.

What does effect the decision to rent rather than buy, is the legal process that everybody has to go through and the risk associated with a sale collapsing, this despite open discussion and comment that the system is in desperate need of reform.  The long winded buying process is unworkable for people who know they will probably have to move at least once if not twice during their formative working years and until such time as a quicker, cheaper workable method of buying and selling property is introduced, this will only further encourage people towards the rental market.

Facts do not lie.

Well in this case with the affordability question, I guess the jury is still out and unless and until we see the figures behind the statements contained in these reports, I for one could not comment further. However, one fact that needs adding to this equation is the evidence we see through our own Agency of a legal system which appears to be getting worse rather than better, causing more deals to collapse. I say this because we see the effect of sales that have gone wrong as owners turn to the rental market to allow them to move on by renting their home out or desperate for rented property to allow their chain not to collapse, in increasing numbers. Add this to the proven fact that more and more people are looking to the rental market for their chosen route to find a home, the problems, cost and delays caused by buying and selling property at present will only swell the ranks further and add to those people turning to the rental market as their solution.

05Sep 2011

Current property News: Rental increases Figures behind the Facts.

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

Here are some of the facts behind the figures that are being quoted organizations who specialize in collating data for the property market. On their own figures do not always mean much, but placed together in this format and a pattern is emerging!

  • Rents rose for the sixth consecutive month in July, increasing by 0.6% to £705 per calender month and marking a new record high. It means that the average rent is now £29 higher per month than in July 2010. Nevertheless, the level of late of unpaid rents fell slightly from 9.3% to 9%, according to the latest Buy-to-Let Index from LSL Property Services.. The average yield also rose reaching 5.2% in July, up from 4.8% a year ago.
  • The greatest rental increase was in London, where rents increased by 7.1%, hitting a new high of £1,009 per month. This was followed by the North East, where rents increased by 5.5%, and the East and West Midlands, where rents rose by 4.8%. Only in Wales have rents remained flat year-on-year. On a monthly basis, rents increased fastest in the South East, up 1.7%, while in Wales and the East Midlands they increased by 1.4% compared to June. David Newnes, estate agency managing director of LSL Property Services, says: “Rents are on an upward trajectory, and it is unlikely that tenants will gain respite any time soon. Demand from thousands of frustrated buyers each month is underpinning buoyant competition for rental homes, enabling landlords to increase prices.
  • “This is the peak summer season, with more renters on the move, the market will continue to heat up. Such strong demand and high rental incomes has forced lenders to take notice, and more are returning to the sector. As a result of the competition in the buy-to-let market, the range of affordable products is expanding – and lending to investors rose by 21% in the last quarter. Nevertheless, even with squeeze on landlord finance abating, the new supply will not be enough to meet demand from tenants.

 

  • Almost a quarter of landlords are feeling more optimistic about the prospects for their property portfolios, rental income and yields. They are helped by a perception of availability of buy-to-let finance: 22% in the second quarter of this year said that it was reasonably available, compared with 17% in the first quarter. According to Paragon Mortgage’s Q2 Private Rented Sector Trends Report, 23% of landlords feel more optimistic than was the case in Q1, particularly if they are professional landlords, with 30% stating they were more optimistic, compared with 15% of smaller-scale landlords. On average, landlords expect to have 13.1 residential properties in their portfolios in a year’s time, compared with 12.6 properties currently.
  • This is the first time in two years that landlords have predicted an increase in the number of properties in their portfolios. Nearly three out of ten landlords (29%) have increased rents during the second quarter, the majority of whom reported an increase of between 2% and 4%. Landlords are also more optimistic about the net value of their portfolios, with a growing proportion expecting an increase in value (14% in Q2 against 13% in Q1), and fewer are forecasting declining values (12% Q2 vs 19% Q1). The majority of landlords (74%) expect net values to remain the same.
  • Also highlighted in the report is a shift in the types of property that landlords are looking to add to their portfolios during the third quarter. Of those looking to purchase during the quarter, terrace houses are the most popular choice, with more than half of landlords saying they expect to buy this type of property. However, there have also been significant increases in the popularity of semi-detached houses (up from 28% to 41%) and detached (up from 9% to 22%).

All of this confirms what we as Agents have seen and continue to see month on month. The rental market is healthy and from the shop floor it is also noticeable, that we are receiving far more enquiries from would be Landlords. The ‘Buy to Let’ market may not rise to the heights of five years ago again, but the investment Landlord is definitely coming back, the only difference is that the market will give this current trend another ‘name’ soon – let’s wait and see!!

04Jul 2011

Current Property News: Increased Renting demands pays dividends for Landlords.

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

I have looked at three pieces of news this morning, all surrounding the property market and I believe all good, proving yet again that the rental property market continues to be positive in a period of time even for the current downturn we are experiencing that has seen nothing but negative news on closures, redundancies and negative forecasts. Other items I read this morning even hinted that ‘savvy’ business people might continue to look to the property market as a better investment than the more traditional stock and finance markets.

Squatting made illegal.

The really interesting point about the news released by the Government recently, is the amount of reporting that defends both the action of squatting and the need for squatters making this bad news for the public in general, but I would like to pick on two points that the majority of commentators have missed. Firstly, it is totally inappropriate to say that Squatters in some way make use of empty property and are therefore unlocking living space for those without a home of their own. This is just a way of turning the eye from the reality of the fact that they have no legal standing in occupying any home they choose, empty or not! I am not in disagreement that empty property could be better used, but only with the acceptance, knowledge or permission of the owner. I do not need to point out the damage caused to owners who are unable to utilise their property because of somebody squatting.  Secondly, all this does, is continue to take pressure of local Councils. This is where any move to utilise property that is truly left unused, as the Government and therefore local Council need to be the vehicle given the power to unlock property that is left empty long term, and is genuinely available to ease our housing needs. One further point for the writer, it is at least Mr Cameron and the words Prime Minister are suffixed by a capital letter!

Gazumping on the increase.

There is no doubt that rents are on the increase, but we are not seeing any great evidence of Gazumping outside of major cities, but before anybody starts to jump up and down about Landlords making profit, two points again that need to be confirmed. It is not often that I comment that we are in a similar position to Estate Agents as letting Agents, but it needs to be confirmed, that we are duty bound to advise our Landlords if a better offer for a property is received, just as Estate Agents would do for their customers, even more so because our contract with our Landlords gives us a duty of responsibility to comply with and therefore we have no choice but to both advise and react to our customers wishes. But holdfast! These were the same Landlords who were faceing offers on property below the asking price only two years ago and this current trend is only really redressing the balance from that period of rent reduction.

Renting numbers still increasing.

This is of course good news and confirms that by the end of this year, the percentage of rented property in the Private sector in the UK will have increased to something close to 20% and overtaken the Public sector at the same time. The issue that jumped out of this report at me was the mention of avoiding rogue agents in the links. Sorry to be a bore, but how simple would that job be if the Government were to protect this now significant and continually increasing sector, by introducing licensed Agents! (Now where have I heard that before?) For me, as a Professional who spends most of his time pushing the message that qualified Letting Agents are both the Tenants and Landlords best way of managing and finding property, allow me to add one more reason to the case: One of the main reasons we have an increase at present is because the Sale market is unable to move property for owners who need to move on and the rental market provides the outlet owners need. But by default, the Estate Agents who now have a captive audience are the beneficiaries of this business. My comment to owners is that they should try at least one qualified specialist Letting Agent. By doing so, you should be amazed just how knowledgeable they are and therefore better protected and prepared you will be in the rental market! This is what being trained in our market means and only by speaking with a specialist office will you find out for yourself what that difference means.

01Jun 2011

Current property News: 95% Mortgage starts to turn the key.

⋅ 2 Comments

By Steve Roulstone

We have seen several items in the press yesterday about the 95% mortgage starting to appear again and of course it has received mixed reviews. However the BBC report on Radio 2 during the lunchtime Jeremy Vine show hosted by Vanessa Feltz was nothing more than an attempt to get as many negative comments about the Banking world from the general public and lacked any real depth, however they did attract several sensible comments about how if housing sales are to start to improve again, a move to ease the deposit burden was bound to be the sensible solution.

Renting options.

The show focused on the options available to those who could not afford to purchase and it was nice to hear one commentator point out that renting is a perfectly viable and acceptable option now and certainly offers a plentiful and varied option of places to set up home (I say this as a Tenant myself) and indeed this same topic was discussed during the finance slot on BBC Breakfast show yesterday.  It is a fact that the rental market has shown consistent growth in demand over the last two years and I have commented many times through these pages that our market is very healthy at present.

Mortgage options.

Now to me these two facts point clearly to the need for better mortgages for Landlords as a way of easing the market and supplying rental property for current demand at the same time. This is another subject that I have mentioned before and I do not apologise for doing so again! It was clear however from the comments made during the show that Mortgages are an emotive issue  with one (poorly advised) person thinking any easing of Mortgage availability was just a way for banks to ‘line their pockets again’. Of course the facts are that Mortgages need to be made easier to obtain before the market starts to move again, no matter what sector of the market is considered.

Differant options.

One area that I do not agree with however is the split option of shared ownership, which has been trialled before (as the problem for first time buyers is not a new one) The problem for me is that no matter how long you own the property, when you come to leave you are still only left with half of the collateral built up in the property during your time under shared ownership. Now most people who use this scheme as a starter home, need to move on having got married, started a family and as is normal need more space. This means that moving to a bigger house can present just as many problems as finding a house in the first place, because shared ownership is only encouraged for started homes. Therefore, assumptions are being made that everybody will be able to improve their circumstances (income) during the period the initial property is shared. Experience tells me this is not the case and guess what? Most co-owners will not allow renting as a method of financing the next move!

One option stands out.

It is a little ironic that the same scheme is being championed again when in the past the rental market was seen as the solution to the eventual problem most shared owners find themselves in! With the current trends which are not only financial but also lifestyle choices for the majority of Tenants the rental market yet again shows itself as the market that can trigger an increase in house sales, if the proper Landlord tool was made available. Surely this is where the Mortgage Companies should be looking alongside any easing of deposits required; after all, buy to let properties have the additional support of that income behind them!

14Apr 2011

Property Landlord advice: Property Investment still stacks up.

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

As a Landlord with several houses purchased through my time as a Letting Agent it is nice to know that my investment in bricks and mortar has been well spent and even taking the current down turn in sales and property value, the investment stands up well against other investment opportunities.

Presentation figures.

As part of a process that I undertake with potential Franchisees, I have put together figures from several sources to confirm how property has performed against its rivals. I chose figures from the last ten years; indeed the last decade 2000 through to 2010 inclusive. It is not that as agents we have to convince people to buy property in the first place, far from it, we enter the scene when owners are deciding if either the market is what they want for their property, or if having made the decision, they wish the property to be managed by Agents rather than themselves. As I point out, it does no harm to be aware of how much better bricks and mortar have performed against what some would perceive as the normal route for investment.

Property v Stocks

 Over the whole eleven year period, property produced 64% growth (National House price statistics) whilst stocks only gave a 6% return (Stock exchange growth figures) Now I am fully aware that the whole point of Stocks and Shares is to buy and sell but this is of course not needed for property so I believe it fair to directly compare one with the other. I am also aware that S&S pay dividends and the average return over the same period was an additional 20%, but then rent also counts and on average, Landlords make 10% of the rent after mortgages have been paid. When both are taken in too account property still looks ahead of the game by some way!

Not forgetting inflation.

I added inflation in (3% gain and 3% inflation = 0% growth) and then looked at information from the Barclays Capital Guilt study 2010 which did the same for Shares, Bonds and Cash. The outcome for property allowing inflation at 28.2% and after paying Tax at 25% gave property at a return of 38% and the best that either Bonds or Cash could offer after inflation was less than 3%, with shares actually losing money! Quite a result I am sure you would agree, as property outperforms its rivals to the power of 10 which all points to Money well invested!