Tag Archives: Furnished Property

22Aug 2012

Tenant advice: Social housing lacking major detail.

⋅ 1 Comment

By Steve Roulstone

A short topic today, but a situation that has left me somewhat surprised by what I found last week when helping a Family member move in to a new rented home through a social housing organisation.

The Lady checking the Tenant in and I, with a common interest in renting, chatted about the differences between what they do in the social sector and what we do in the private sector and it was noticeable that despite the obvious difference being the nature of the Tenant, and their circumstances, the trappings of how we do our business remains the same, I pad and agreements in hand!

What we did not speak about and what I found the most dramatic difference was the standard of the house concerned and what Tenants are supposed to put up with in the social sector. Actually, it was not so much the house as the fittings or lack of them!

The property itself was fairly modern, being no older than twenty years or so, but downstairs only had laminate in the kitchen and bare concrete floors elsewhere. Upstairs the picture was the same with bare wooden floorboards and throughout, not a curtain at any window.

I can just imagine the reaction of any private Tenant should I carry out a viewing at a house and inform them they would have to carpet throughout and find curtains for every window themselves! I can assure you we would let very few houses!

There was also the question of the state and condition. The Kitchen had three walls painted red and one wall half painted (and not in a its finished type of half) the main bedroom was painted in union flag shades of red blue and white, in blocks some two feet wide, in stripes! The second bedroom in cerise pink on one wall only! Now when we check Tenants out of a property we ensure the decoration is both as it was when the Tenancy started and therefore in good order for the new Tenant and start of Tenancy. It seems clear that when people leave social housing they are not checked, or if they are nothing is done to correct or put right the type of decorating schemes that would strike us in the private sector speechless.

The obvious smack in the mouth opinion that I am left with, is that those who have little choice of where they are able to live because of their financial position ensuring they do not have choice, have to accept whatever house becomes available when it is offered and are therefore also left with the bill of being able to live with the very basics of comforts by having to purchase both carpets and curtains themselves!

This when they are where they are because of financial difficulties is a situation which does not sit well with me. Perhaps I am naive in my outlook, but it is clear the Housing authorities and Social Housing providers are happy to rely upon the charity of the wider family to enable those in dire straits to be provided with such basic comforts as curtains and carpets!

At least if the Government do manage to find a way of attracting the Private sector to social Tenants, another much wider subject of discussion, at least they will enjoy a far better standard of accommodation without the fear of how much such a move could cost them or their relatives!

22Aug 2011

Property Landlord advice: Tenancy problems that should be avoided.

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

 

One issue that continues to raise its head from time to time is the condition of property when the Tenant moves in. Not when it has been left in any poor state by the outgoing Tenant, because any agent knows how to deal with that problem. After all it is in the agents power to do what is needed to deal with the state and condition of a property when it is the outgoing Tenant that has caused the problem and of course the Agent will also be aware when the work is going to be carried out and when the next Tenant is due to move in. No the problem I am referring to is when the property is new to the market, or new to the Agent and it is the Landlord who is not carrying out the work they have promised and the work is therefore NOT in the control of the Agent.

First impression.

 

It is not common for Agents to criticise Landlords, but when this happens it is the Agent that bears the brunt of the complaints from the new Tenant and let’s be honest, why shouldn’t they complain, if the first thing they have to do is clean the property from top to bottom because work they have been promised has not been carried out! I know how I would feel under such circumstances and even if it is just one room, because of say decoration, it matters not, because most Ladies will then feel the whole house has been left in a poor state. Now most of the time, one persons ‘clean’ is a matter of conjecture rather than a definitive condition, but the problems caused by allowing this situation to arise for the rest of the Tenancy can be very damaging.

No choice!

 

Of course the big problem for any incoming Tenant is the lack of options most would have when faced with a dirty house. In the majority of cases everything depends on the move and having either left another rented or property that has been sold, no other options exist and this is when bad feelings really set in because nobody likes to be left with a ‘fait accompli’ that they have no say in or no other choice. Left to fester, the Landlord immediately has a problem on his hands and I would venture to suggest that if the property is being self managed (Tenant find for the Agent) then it is highly possible that the whole Tenancy will fair badly from that moment onwards.   

 

Check it out!

 

There is no doubt when the Tenants do leave it is going to be very difficult for the Agent or Landlord to prove any damage or cleanliness issues caused by the Tenant and even if let’s say the garden is not looked after with an uncut lawn, heels will be dug in if it mentioned because of the state of the house when they moved in. The other area commonly causing problems is the furniture not wanted by the Tenant being left at the property. Put simply, just because the Landlord does not want it, why should the Tenant have to put up with it?

Start well – end well.

 

Compare that situation to a house presented in excellent order, clean and ready to be occupied. Then the Tenant starts the Tenancy well and knows that they are not the only ones who want or need to look after the property. Over the years we have had many situations like this, where the solution is not in our hands (We cannot employ cleaners or move furniture without permission) and the disappointment is that it continues to happen. Best advice is not always listened to, but the follow up from the Tenants is always heard, because we are the Agent of the Landlord and are duty bound to look after his interests it is our job to do so: But it does not mean we enjoy it!

10Jun 2011

Property Landlord advice: Gardens and Renting how to get it right!

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

This time of year, as agents visit the properties under their charge, the most common phone call to the Tenant, if they were not present during the property visit, becomes the request to tidy the Garden. So often the Garden, especially when the house concerned is a family home is so well tended and designed that when the property is let expectations about the manner in which it is kept can be misinterpreted resulting in disappointment at the very least and in some cases frustration and anger.

The problem.

We all know a tidy garden helps us rent the property, but Landlords need to understand that when they rent their property, whilst it is the Tenants responsibility to look after the house and garden in a proper manner, this does not necessarily mean it will be kept in the style you would wish. It is the translation of the term ‘proper manner’ which can cause the problem. If such a matter should reach court, as periodically they do, then the Judge is in all probability going to ignore any claim made against the Tenant because all a Tenant is charged to do is keep the Garden in reasonable order and not to the same standard or manner kept by the previous owners, as time would normally be given by the courts for the Tenant to address the issue.

Reasonable Standard.

This is what would be expected of all Tenants the problem being that reasonable can just be mowing the lawn and stopping the borders from being full of weeds. This does not include tending for plants, over wintering in a greenhouse or cutting back at the appropriate time of the year. The point that needs to be appreciated is that by renting the property you are accepting that the Tenants will be allowed to live in a manner which suits themselves and not how you may wish them too. The point being, that tending the garden to the standards you wish for is not required, just the ability to keep the appearance neat and tidy is all that should be expected by the Landlord.

Covering all bases.

This means that provision needs to be made prior to the property being rented to ensure the Landlord achieves what they want for the Garden. I myself, with a wife who just falls short of sleeping in the Garden, having just moved, made arrangements for a Gardener of our choice to visit the house every week. The resulting bill we pay, but were able to rent the property with Gardens tended at a better price. I believe this made the choice easier for our Tenants as they continue to enjoy a mature garden with plants flowering throughout the year. But even with this provision, we both know the Garden will slowly suffer, as nobody cares for a garden better than the Gardener!

Rent to a Gardener.

I have of course on many an occasion, been told by the prospective Tenant, ‘oh how lovely a garden I can look after’! Only to be disappointed by the lack of efforts they then put in. So my advice and I believe the only advice that can ensure the best results, is to ensure if it matters that much to you, the Gardens are looked after by the person you appoint – which means your own Gardener. I certainly would not suggest you do them yourself, as this would not be acceptable to the incoming Tenant.

Family home or Buy to Let?

Of course it matters so much as to why the house came to be rented in the first place and as so many houses that were lived in by Parents are now entering the Rental market, it is quite often that the Garden so lovingly nurtured by your parents is so important to you in how it is looked after by others. My advice in the past has also been to carry out a major re-fit if seeing the vegetable patch turn to weeds and slugs is going to be so upsetting. By having the Garden stripped and relayed to lawn for example, you remove the problem in one go. After all, nobody will ever look after the Garden in the manner your parents did and this can be a very good way of removing the garden as an issue, in the same way as ensuring the Bathroom and Kitchen (the two most important rooms in any house) are in a rentable condition, but that is another story!

10May 2011

Property Landlord advice: Renting with white goods and part furnished.

⋅ Leave a Comment

By Steve Roulstone

One of the roles of my position as Franchisor is to hold regular update meetings with other Castle Estate Franchisees. At a meeting held this week with a relatively new Franchisee an issue was raised that every agent has to deal with at one time or another and no matter which way a landlord wishes to get round the problem, leaving white goods and some furniture at a property will always remain a Landlords responsibility and my advise has always been simple – don’t!

White goods.

Once left at the start of a Tenancy, there is no clever way to stop white goods being either the responsibility of the Landlord or the subject of a dispute if and when it breaks down! I have spoken to so many Landlords who believe that by leaving a fridge their property will be more attractive to any potential Tenant. The truth is it is not and in simplistic terms, why worry? If an incoming Tenant cannot afford a fridge themselves, then they are probably not the Tenant the Landlord would wish for their house in the first place (Not including a cooker of course, which should always be supplied!)Plus what happens to the fridge they already own? Better remove both the goods and the responsibility in the first place.

Fitted white goods.

Now we have a situation where there is no simple answer, as fitted goods need to be maintained (and that does include the Dishwasher!) and when removed the property becomes less attractive. We need to think what our own reaction would be to being told we need to find our own washing machine for that hole in the cupboard? Of course this will be white goods we would probably never be able to use again, as fitted white goods are either smaller in depth or may not look pretty when installed without the cupboard surrounding it! Now be honest, would we seriously purchase our own in these circumstances?

Part Furnished.

Now we come to the worst of all scenarios, as I can absolutely guarantee, that should we find a Tenant who does need a three piece suite and a double and single bed first time round (providing of course that it meets safety requirements) we will not second time. Eventually you will end up removing all furniture as Tenants come along with their own bed and three piece, so rather than reduce the market to whom the house is acceptable, my advice is always remove all furniture now, for unless it is fully furnished (which is still a very small percentage of the overall market ) the furniture you do wish to leave will end up being a problem earlier or later in the lifetime of the rented property.  

Simple solution

In the end the advice to the Franchisee has not changed since I carried out the role myself, where possible remove white goods and furniture. Where it is to the detriment of the property, leave them but accept responsibility for maintenance. As far as furniture is concerned, unless fully furnished, remove all furniture from day one and make the property more acceptable to more of the market. All said with one rider – where the Landlord insists, we carry out our customers wishes!

06Aug 2010

Property Landlord Advice: The need for an Inventory

⋅ 1 Comment

By Mike Edwards

Because of my day to day involvement with Rental issues, there are always reminders about advice that can be given to Landlords and problems on a recent tenant find case has highlighted the need for a detailed inventory attached to a tenancy and emphasised how critical this document is.

The case in hand.

In this case and despite our best efforts in advising the Landlord not to be so short sighted, he instructed one of our offices that an inventory was not required. The tenancy involved four sharers in one property. In such tenancies an inventory is even more critical. There are now extensive problems, the deposit is protected in one of the Tenancy Deposit Protection (TDP) schemes and the question is how to retain the deposit for the damage etc.

The inevitable result.

The answer in the short term is that it cannot be retained and the tenants are highly likely to raise a dispute via the Scheme Administrator. All three schemes have been at pains to constantly emphasise the need for a quality inventory if a dispute comes before them. In fact one has gone as far as to say that without the inventory the landlord has no chance of claiming anything in terms of dilapidations and damage at the end of the tenancy – even if the tenant has stolen all the furniture from a fully furnished property!!

The cost of hindsight.

Money is probably the reason this Landlord did not want an inventory and if so then in my opinion it is folly of the highest order. Many agents include the cost of an in-house inventory in their initial Landlord fee, and those that do not will do so at an extra cost which is normally a reasonable amount.

Best advice.

In simple terms no inventory means a Landlord will struggle to make any claim against a tenant when dilapidation is an issue. Damage or missing items can be impossible to prove without not only a list, but a proper accountable system of inventory that will stand to account when challenged. As Letting Agents, we are charged to give best advice to our Landlords at all times and at all times our best advice is to ensure a robust and well prepared inventory always accompanies your Tenancy paperwork.

10Jul 2010

Property Landlord Advice: When is an HMO not an HMO?

⋅ 13 Comments
By Steve Roulstone
 
Never! 

 There has been a lot of confusion caused by the Housing Act of 2004, where HMO property is concerned as introduced in April 2006 surrounding licensed buildings, but the changes are actually simpler than they first appear.

 To license or not to license?

 This is the real question for Landlords and the real crux behind the changes. It is also where a clear definition of what represents a House of Multiple Occupation. Conversely, it is also this area that has given rise to the biggest area of confusion amongst Landlords and the mistaken belief that if there house does not match these criteria, that HMO regulations can be ignored.

 Two families and the Council decide.

What all Landlords need to be aware of and appreciate is that any property that has more than two families living at the property (More than two families represented who are not co-habiting) as their permanent address, then as far as the Council are concerned, it is an HMO! Maybe not one that needs a license, but as far as safety is concerned and this can mean Fire doors and surrounds, Fire walls and escape windows, then the Council will in all probability order that such safety measures are installed for the safety of the Tenants.

The Council decides, or not!

And here is the next problem facing all Landlords. Not all Councils take the same view or level of safety when considering identical styles of property! Prior to its introduction I spoke to and worked with my Council, who independently of other areas, decided to take a review of all property that they believed was operating as an HMO through there register of student homes in the Town. This gave me both an insight and early approach to both the knowledge needed and ensuring my Landlords, existing and new, were well informed.

Confident letting.

 So what my advice to all Landlords is, if you are renting to more than two family units, then your local Council will definitely consider it to be a House of Multiple Occupation. Unless it requires licensing by number of stories or people residing, then you could be forced to take appropriate changes to the safety of the building as your Council sees fit, so take advice first and speak to the Council before you find out the hard way!

Steve Roulstone

22Jun 2010

Property Landlord Advice: Furnished or Unfurnished, That is the dilemma!

⋅ 21 Comments

By Steve Roulstone

 

The Golden touch of Magnolia.

Surprisingly, or maybe not when you understand why, it is still the simple touch that gets the approval from Tenants. Unfurnished and plain walls with plain carpet in good order and no matter what you feel, Magnolia fits the bill. The first Golden Rule of rentals.

Flat or House to Rent.

The choice is still the same. Tenants need to be able to see their own Furniture and belongings in the property they wish to rent and if the walls and floors are in neutral colours, then there is an increased chance they will pick your property.

Avoid the Regulations.

There are two points about why a Landlord should avoid Furniture, firstly the whole question of what is allowed and what is not can be avoided if no soft furnishings are included and secondly, no matter what furniture is included, experience tells me that something will come under question, either the lack of what the Tenant perceives as items that should be included or the wish to be able to bring their own bed or three piece, making said item you have provided extra to requirements and leaving you with the problem of storage.

Unfurnished Home to Rent.

So maximise your options in this ever growing market and making it easier for your Tenant to choice your home, is the next best thing. To prove the point, consider this: In all of my time at Castle Estates I have always received agreement when I point out that Tenants look after their own property better than the Landlords! This is only natural and I believe we would all be the same the upside is that they will also look after the house better when populated by the Tenants furniture.

Unfurnished, not Unimpressive.

But do not forget the power of impression. Imagine yourself Cooking in the Kitchen and Bathing in the Bathroom of your property. Now if you would be happy so would your Tenant. Quality Kitchens and Bathrooms in a neutrally decorated and carpeted house will put you at the top of the property rental selection tree!