By Steve Roulstone
Once again I have a subject that is very relevant to our own office, as it is based upon something that has caused some consternation this week. It seems that the only way it could have been avoided was to keep a Landlord away from his own property even though the reason for his visit was perfectly reasonable!
Managed should mean Managed.
Of course, when we are appointed by Landlords as their Managing Agent, it is not with the thought that the Landlord is then going to be visiting the property with Tenant ensconced on a regular basis. Far from it, I am a firm believer in encouraging Landlords to stay away from the property, even when they live next door, which happens more often than you would envisage! If we are appointed to be the Landlords representative, then we need to be allowed to do our job and because we have systems which ensure all actions carried out are done so correctly and that all conversations, comments and requests are noted, when this happens outside of our control it can leave us with problems, either then or later.
Coming back to bite you.
The instance that happened this week was of a Landlord unable to recall exactly what was said during a visit made (with permission of course!) to carry our maintenance (another blog all in its own right!) but it was the subject of the conversation which was the problem, because the Tenant having left the property, is being asked to decorate a bedroom back from purple walls to magnolia and yet they are stating they sought and gained the Landlords approval when they spoke.
Correct procedures at all times.
The main point here is that every member of our staff knows that as soon as any Tenant asks about decoration, we have a set procedure which includes confirmation in writing of both the request and response as well as submitting sample colours for approval. The same applies to any conversation which may have implications, we record the content, but what it is difficult to do is point out to the Landlord that they have gone about matters the wrong way by not informing us of the request when the initial approach was first made.
Implications.
In this case, it is going to be difficult to prove the Tenant wrong, especially as we have nothing in writing to back up our case should the matter go to arbitration through the TDS scheme, which it probably will, so we may see the Landlord having to both paint the bedroom himself and pay for the privilege as a result of what started out as an innocent property visit carried out by the Landlord.
Recommendations.
So it is for cases such as this that we try wherever possible to encourage Landlords to stay away from their own property, or at the very least, to always ask the Tenants to contact us about any issue they raise, no matter how small, rather than get involved themselves, no matter how innocent the subject appears. Only then can we ensure that we remain in control of the situation and able to ‘Manage’ the position on behalf of the Landlord, after all I am yet to find any Landlord who approved purple paint for any room in their house!
Recent Comments